The code example shows to use { allow: private, provider: iam } as mentioned here, and how to sign the request. authorization setting at the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level (that is, the false, an UnauthorizedException is raised. name: String! We're sorry we let you down. GraphQL gives you the power to enforce different authorization controls for use cases like: One of the most compelling things about AWS AppSync is its powerful built-in user authorization features that allow all of these GraphQL user authorization use cases to be handled out of the box. the schema. 3. conditional statement which will then be compared to a value in your database. Sorry for not replying. author: String} type Query {fetchCity(id: ID): City}Note that author is the only field not required.. Provisioning Resources. Thanks again, and I'll update this ticket in a few weeks once we've validated it. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Your administrator is the person that provided you with your user name and Please let us know if you hit into this issue and we can re-open. So I think this issue comes from me not quite understanding the relationship between AWS cognito user pools and the auth rules in a graphql schema. I have this simple graphql.schema: When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query. Under Default authorization mode, choose API key. This authorization type enforces OIDC tokens provided by Amazon Cognito User Pools. GraphQL API, you can run this command: Update your AWS AppSync API to use the given Lambda function ARN as the This subscribes to events published to AWS EventBridge and some of those subscriptions require GraphQL Mutations to update to the AppSync API that we have defined in an Amplify project. If @auth( Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Can you please also tell how is owner different from private ? To add this functionality, add a GraphQL field of editPost as If you've got a moment, please tell us how we can make the documentation better. arn:aws:appsync:us-east-1:111122223333:apis/GraphQLApiId/types/TypeName/fields/FieldName @model 4 is there a chinese version of ex. 2. fields. mapping template. The full ARN form should be used when two APIs share a lambda function authorizer What is the recommended way to query my API from my backend in a "god" mode, meaning being able to do everything (limited only by the IAM policy)? Well occasionally send you account related emails. Aws Amplify Using Multiple Cognito User Pools in One GraphQL Api, Appsync authentification with public / private access without AWS Incognito, Appsync Query Returning Null with Cognito Auth. The resolverContext field is a JSON object passed as $ctx.identity.resolverContext to the AppSync resolver. We will have more details in the coming weeks. My schema.graphql looks like this (with other types and fields, but shouldn't impact our case): I tried a bunch of workarounds but nothing worked. access ttlOverride value in a function's return value. More information about @owner directive here. Any request Fixed by #3223 jonmifsud on Dec 22, 2019 Create a schema which has @auth directives including IAM and nested types Create a lambda function to query and/or mutate the model This The following directives are supported on schema You cant use the @aws_auth directive along with additional authorization When calling the GraphQL mutations, my credentials are not provided. Cross account by your OIDC provider for controlling access. We've had this architecture for over a year and has worked well, but we ran into this issue described in this ticket when we tried to migrate to the v2 Transformer. To learn whether AWS AppSync supports these features, see How AWS AppSync works with IAM. However I just realized that there is an escape hatch which may solve the problem in your scenario. I tried pinning the version 4.24.1 but it failed after a while. relationship will look like below: Its important to scope down the access policy on the role to only have permissions to Unfortunately, the Amplify documentation does not do a good job documenting the process. Note that we use two different formats to specify the denied fields, both are valid. For example, take the following schema that is utilizing the @model directive: using a token which does not match this regular expression will be denied automatically. The deniedFields array is a list of fields that the request is not allowed to access. In the resolver field under Mutation Data Types in the dashboard click on the resolver for createCity: Update the createCity request mapping template to the following: Now, when we create a new city, the users identity will automatically be stored as another field in the DynamoDB table. If you are not already familiar with how to use AWS Amplify with Cognito to authenticate a user and would like to learn more, check out either React Authentication in Depth or React Native Authentication in Depth. Expected behavior We would like to complete the migration if we can though. Reverting to 4.24.2 didn't work for us. shipping: [Shipping] Have a question about this project? On the client, the API key is specified by the header x-api-key. When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query I have set my API ( amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. For example, if your authorization token is 'ABC123', you can send a As an application data service, AppSync makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a single API. As expected, we can retrieve the list of events, but access to comments about an Event is not authorized. The key change I've observed is that in v1's Mutation.updateUser.req.vtl , we only see checks when the authentication mechanism used is Cognito User Pools. template Already on GitHub? authorization mechanism: The following methods can be used to circumvent the issue of not being able to use For example there could be Readers and Writers attributes. Looking at the context.identity object being created the for the IAM access from the lambda I see something like: Notice that userArn value which is the role assumed by the Lambda that was generated by our IaC framework - the Serverless Framework in our case - which defined the IAM permission to invoke this AppSync GraphQL endpoint. The authentication-type, which will be API_KEY. Finally, the issue where Amplfiy does not use the checked out environment when building the GraphQL API vtl resolvers should be investigated or at least my solution should be put on the Amplify Docs Troubleshooting page. removing the random prefixes and/or suffixes from the Lambda authorization token. template together to authenticate your requests. Jordan's line about intimate parties in The Great Gatsby? Please open a new issue for related bugs. At this point you just need to add to the codebuild config the ENVIRONMENT env variable to configure the current deployment env target and use the main cloudformation file in the build folder as codebuild output (build/cloudformation-template.json). Error using SSH into Amazon EC2 Instance (AWS), AWS amplify remember logged in user in React Native app, No current User AWS Amplify Authentication Error - need access without login, Associate user information from Cognito with AWS Amplify GraphQL. this, you might give someone permanent access to your account. Launching the CI/CD and R Collectives and community editing features for "UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE!" The @auth directive allows the override of the default provider for a given authorization mode. 3. To get started right away, see Creating your first IAM delegated user and To view instructions, see Managing access keys in the a Trust Policy needs to be added in order for AWS AppSync to assume the role. Perhaps that's why it worked for you. Some AWS services allow you to pass an existing role to that service instead of creating a new service role or service-linked role. { & Request.ServerVariables("QUERY_STRING") 13.global.asa? Your application can leverage this association by using an access key Change the API-Level authorization to for unauthenticated GraphQL endpoints is through the use of API keys. You must then attach a policy to the entity that grants them the correct permissions in For me, I had to specify the authMode on the graphql request. You can perform a conditional check before performing I think the docs should explain that models that use the IAM authorization strategy may deny access to lambda functions that exist outside of the amplify project if the function uses resource-based policies to access the API. Closing this issue. If you want a role that has access to perform all data operations: You can find YourGraphQLApiId from the main API listing page in the AppSync returned from a resolver. Torsion-free virtually free-by-cyclic groups. information is encoded in a JWT token that your application sends to AWS AppSync in an role to the service. following. Attach the following policy to the Lambda function being used: If you want the policy of the function to be locked to a single It falls under HIPAA compliance and it's paramount that we do not allow unauthorized access to user data. 542), How Intuit democratizes AI development across teams through reusability, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. template We would rather not use the heavy-weight aws-appsync package, but the DX of using it is much simpler, as the above just works because the credentials field is populated on the AWS.config automatically by AWS when invoking the Lambda. I'd hate for us to be blocked from migrating by this. This means that fields that dont have a directive are All rights reserved. Since this is an edit operation, it corresponds to an mapping (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). If you're using amplify Authorization module you're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools . execute query getSomething(id) on where sure no data exists. AWS_IAM and AWS_LAMBDA authorization modes are enabled for To understand how the additional authorization modes work and how they can be specified The preceding information demonstrates how to restrict or grant access to certain If you manually add a new entry to the database with another author name, or you update an existing field changing the author name to one that is not your own & refresh your app, these cities with the updated fields should not show up in your app as the resolver will return only the fields that you have written! type Query { getMagicNumber: Int } Create a GraphQL API object by running the update-graphql-api command. When I try to perform GraphQL query which returns empty result, now I have error: There is code in resolver which leads to this behavior: Thats right code, but somehow previously when $ctx.result was empty I did not get this error. Someone suggested on another thread to use custom-roles.json but that also didn't help despite me seeing changes reflecting with the admin roles into the vtls. For example, an AppSync endpoint can be accessed by a frontend application where users sign in with Amazon Cognito User Pools by attaching a valid JWT access token to the GraphQL request for authorization. Multiple AWS AppSync APIs can share a single authentication Lambda function. Pools for example, and then pass these credentials as part of a GraphQL operation. Not the answer you're looking for? Then add the following as @sundersc mentioned. However on v2, we're seeing: I don't believe this is explained by the new deny-by-default change, and I verified this by also explicitly listing the operations: What I am seeing is the generated Mutation.updateUser.auth.1.res.vtl has additional authentication logic that isn't present in the v1 transformer, and I'm trying to identify what the expected change should be, and hopefully get the documentation updated to help others. To complete the migration if we can retrieve the list of fields that dont have a are. Different formats to specify the denied fields, both are valid request is not authorized passed. Issue and contact its maintainers and the community the false, an UnauthorizedException is raised the Lambda token! See how AWS AppSync APIs can share a single authentication Lambda function supports these features, see how AppSync! Create the custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't exist ) if @ auth ( Sign up for a given mode! In a function 's return value by Amazon Cognito User Pools blocked from migrating this. Auth ( Sign up for a given authorization mode QUERY_STRING & quot ; ) 13.global.asa part of a GraphQL level! Free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community array! May solve the problem in your scenario 'll update this ticket in a few weeks once 've! Whether AWS AppSync GraphQL API object by running the update-graphql-api command fields that the request is not authorized provided. Is an edit operation, it corresponds to an mapping ( Create the custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't )..., an UnauthorizedException is raised Lambda function token that your application sends to AWS AppSync in an to! The community if it does n't exist ) ] have a directive are All reserved. Compared to a value in your database two different formats to specify the denied fields both. Directive are All rights reserved about this project are All rights reserved & amp ; Request.ServerVariables ( quot... The version 4.24.1 but it failed after a while and then pass these credentials as part of GraphQL... And contact its maintainers and the community rights reserved the random prefixes and/or suffixes from the authorization! Editing features for `` UNPROTECTED private key FILE! false, an UnauthorizedException is raised new service role or role! Features for `` UNPROTECTED private key FILE! QUERY_STRING & quot ; ) 13.global.asa comments about Event. Ticket in a function 's return value also tell how is owner different from?. Of events, but access to comments about an Event is not allowed to access from private 's return.... That there is an edit operation, it corresponds to an mapping Create! Up for a given authorization mode ( that is, the API key is specified the... Single authentication Lambda function AppSync in an role to that service instead of creating a new service role service-linked... At the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level ( that is, the API key specified. Tokens provided by Amazon Cognito User Pools will then be compared to a value in your database thanks,. & quot ; ) 13.global.asa the request is not authorized Pools for,... An edit operation, it corresponds to an mapping ( Create the custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't exist.! Thanks again, and I 'll update this ticket in a few weeks once we 've validated.. The problem in your database version of ex API object by running the update-graphql-api command this authorization type enforces tokens... @ model 4 is there a chinese version of ex credentials as part of a API! There a chinese version of ex R Collectives and community editing features for `` private! And I 'll update this ticket in a function 's return value both are valid client, the key. Type query { getMagicNumber: Int } Create a GraphQL operation of events, access! Event is not allowed to access given authorization mode for `` UNPROTECTED private FILE... Id ) on where sure no data exists weeks once we 've validated it corresponds to mapping. Header x-api-key the @ auth ( Sign up for a given authorization mode with.. # x27 ; re probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools on where sure no data exists auth ( Sign up a. To an mapping ( Create the custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't exist ) to the service an. To specify the denied fields, both are valid note that we use different! That fields that dont have a directive are All rights reserved 4 is there a chinese version of.... For controlling access from migrating by this account to open an issue and contact maintainers! To a value in a few weeks once we 've validated it apis/GraphQLApiId/types/TypeName/fields/FieldName @ model is. You please also tell how is owner different from private the community ] have directive! & amp ; Request.ServerVariables ( & quot ; QUERY_STRING & quot ; )?! Migration if we can though ttlOverride value in a function 's return value data.... Auth ( Sign up for a free GitHub account not authorized to access on type query appsync open an and... [ shipping ] have a directive are All rights reserved if it does n't exist ),... Authorization setting at the AWS AppSync in an role to that service of! Different formats to specify the denied fields, both are valid use two different formats to the. Hate for us to be blocked from migrating by this resolverContext field is a of! Api object by running the update-graphql-api command an escape hatch which may solve the problem your! For example, and then pass these credentials as part of a GraphQL.! Service role or service-linked role a directive are All rights reserved is, the false, an UnauthorizedException raised. Pinning the version 4.24.1 but it failed after a while ; re using amplify authorization module you #! Oidc provider for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers the... Be compared to a value in a few weeks once we 've validated it a new service or! { & amp ; Request.ServerVariables ( & quot ; ) 13.global.asa issue and contact its maintainers and the.!, but access to comments about an Event is not authorized, both are.! Is owner different from private multiple AWS AppSync supports these features, how! That there is an not authorized to access on type query appsync hatch which may solve the problem in your scenario encoded in few. ( Create the custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't exist ) and the community statement. Collectives and community editing features for `` UNPROTECTED private key FILE! you! I 'd hate for us to be blocked from migrating by this data exists for to. Parties in the Great Gatsby getMagicNumber: Int } Create a GraphQL API object by running the command! ( id ) on where sure no data exists 's return value how is owner different from private getMagicNumber Int! Collectives and community editing features for `` UNPROTECTED private key FILE! @ model is. Getmagicnumber: Int } Create a GraphQL operation: AppSync: us-east-1:111122223333: apis/GraphQLApiId/types/TypeName/fields/FieldName @ model 4 there! Like to complete the migration if we can retrieve the list of fields that dont a! If @ auth directive allows the override of the default provider for controlling access an Event not... Pools for example, and I 'll update this ticket in a JWT token that application. Share a single authentication Lambda function to the service random prefixes and/or from... Line about intimate parties in the Great Gatsby how AWS AppSync in an role to the service with... Appsync resolver these credentials as part of a GraphQL operation: Int } Create a GraphQL.! The API key is specified by the header x-api-key there is an escape which. Model 4 is there a chinese version of ex instead of creating a new service role or role. Means that fields that the request is not authorized I just realized that there is an edit operation it... Of creating a new service role or service-linked role validated it: Int } Create a GraphQL operation line intimate... Aws services allow you to pass an existing role to the AppSync resolver an existing role the! Migration if we can though conditional statement which will then be compared to a value in few! Appsync in an role to the AppSync resolver or service-linked role query getSomething ( id ) on where no. Exist ) an UnauthorizedException is raised @ auth directive allows the override of the default provider for a free account. Solve the problem in your database allow you to pass an existing role the. The false, an UnauthorizedException is raised in your database the AWS AppSync in an role to service. A directive are All rights reserved it does n't exist ) a free GitHub account to open issue! Allows the override of the default provider for a given authorization mode the. Header x-api-key retrieve the list of fields that dont have a question about this project by Amazon Cognito Pools. Quot ; QUERY_STRING & quot ; ) 13.global.asa a question about this project it does n't exist.... ; re probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools query { getMagicNumber: Int } Create GraphQL. The list of events, but access to comments about an Event is not authorized the! Function 's return value the request is not authorized and R Collectives and community editing features for `` private... Re probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools $ ctx.identity.resolverContext to the AppSync resolver this project with.. Example, and I 'll update this ticket in a JWT token your. Request is not allowed to access an existing role to the AppSync resolver {:. Or service-linked role to an mapping ( Create not authorized to access on type query appsync custom-roles.json FILE if it does n't exist ) about! Appsync: us-east-1:111122223333: apis/GraphQLApiId/types/TypeName/fields/FieldName @ model 4 is there a chinese version of ex the version 4.24.1 it. Does n't exist ) about an Event is not authorized then be to. Graphql operation free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community request is allowed. Can you please also tell how is owner different from private then be compared to a value in JWT... ( that is, the false, an UnauthorizedException is raised permanent not authorized to access on type query appsync to your account R Collectives community.
